[image: Grave Marker, 2013, JA Van Devender]
Yorktown Nat. Cemetery, Yorktown Battlefield, Va.
1 Timothy 6:11–12 (NKJV)
11 But you, O man of God, flee these things and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, gentleness. 12 Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, to which you were also called and have confessed the good confession in the presence of many witnesses.
Presently in El Paso, Tx. starting an extended photo shoot through the Rockies with my brother. A superlong day of travel to get here (20 hours) but anticipation is high, particularly the anticipation of collapsing in bed just shortly. Hope to get some photos in the works tomorrow (Tuscon area - first photo stop)
This photo was from my recent trip to Williamsburg/Yorktown Battlefield. It was a very somber moment for me to look down on a long dead, very distant relative. He was from the "Northern" segment of my family who, doubtless because they kept their Dutch roots longer than the Southern segment, had not lost the original spelling of the last name. I wondered how old he was... and what were the chances that the Southerner who killed him might have been one of my relatives also. His name (James W.) goes back a long way in my family line and I have a nephew with that same first name and initial though I doubt the "W" in this man's name stood for "Willard." All in all, I found myself strangely moved.. a very definite sense of connection linked me to this man and my eyes got a bit misty.
Life in this world takes strange twists on occasion doesn't it? I wonder what some future relative might think looking down on my tombstone one day, if such is in the Lord's plans. I know this, that the battles each of us fight as we journey through this life have eternal consequences that link us all together. This relative died struggling for a great cause... and so, in the last analysis... will we all. We may not face hideous cannon fire but how we die is not as critically important as how we live prior to that event. I do not know if this man had saving faith. I hope he did. But this I know... that the words Paul spoke to Timothy apply to us today just as much as they applied to this man, assuming in his years he heard them... which is most highly probable.
We have a "good fight" to wage. We have to "lay hold" to eternal life in whatever relatively long or short period of time we have to heed the command. Our life can be cut short in a moment even as was his. Whatever task we have to do at the moment we must do with all our might, ever remembering that our labors are not in vain. But, and this is most important, the battles we fight are not to the end of purchasing our eternal life... that has been already done for us. The Savior who walks with us in our battles has purchased us our redemption, when we "lay hold" to eternal life, it is in "grasping" and "holding on" to that truth. It is the struggle of faith to make it "sure" and to discover how the Lord is daily reinforcing His Presence with us.
Tonight, as I go down, I will remember this stone once again and then I will cast my thoughts back, to that day long ago when my Savior, cleansed me once and forever of my sin with His very own blood, and then that following first Easter morning when He rose victorious to give me that eternal life which I will share with Him forever.
I hope I see James there, waiting for me one day. What a glorious story he would have to tell. And maybe, he would find my story interesting also. We would have a lot more in common than just our blood and name.


Those Poor Guys in Cleveland.....
Isaiah 1:17 (NKJV)
17 Learn to do good; Seek justice, Rebuke the oppressor; Defend the fatherless, Plead for the widow.
Patrick Henry was probably not a man I would ordinarily invite home for dinner I think. My impression of him, which may be entirely wrong, is that he was one of those sharp-eyed zealots whose demeanor was that of always being "on-edge." I don't think of him as "companionable" in the ordinary sense of the term. That's ok, it's not a criticism, I think it would mean that I would rather have him on my side than against me... but I probably wouldn't have him home for dinner.
It was in this building that Patrick Henry stood and spoke and moved the leaders of colonial Virginia, a very powerful colony, to take strong measures against the unfair, discriminatory taxation that the Parliament of England had imposed them. Something had to be done. The various colonies had to act in concert, not individually, if any hope of recourse might be attained. The taxes were an insult to their standing as "Englishmen" and represented arrogant, arbitrary discrimination against the hard-working colonists who, as they clearly perceived, actually represented the future.... either for England, if she listened, or for themselves, if she didn't. It was a tense, scary time.... but something had to be done... something had to be said... and it needed to come from across the spectrum of colonial America and not just by scattered voices here and there.
I wonder what Patrick Henry would say today? I wonder what speeches he would give and what fiery language would he use. It is openly recognized that certain American tax-payers have been subjected to systematic, sustained harrassment by Federal agencies, pre-eminently by the "Revenooers" in Cleveland. One woman reported that she was subjected to 17 surprise audit/investigations/demands for information in her pursuit of a "non-profit" status for an organization she was forming. Her legal bills amounted to hundreds of thousands of dollars just to provide representation and compliance with the demands.
That is what she endured. Systematic, detailed, abusive and illegal inquiries beyond the scope of any common sense understanding of what might be required to grant non-profit status to a proposed organization. Why was she subjected to this? Because her politics were suspicious. She appeared to be one of those troublesome conservatives that wanted to ensure that the votes that were being cast in various elections were actually those of people who were alive at the time.... she wanted to form a watch dog organization against voter fraud.
Clearly, Patrick Henry would be a mite upset. He might demand to know how this abuse was going to be corrected and he might further demand that criminal proceedings be initiated against those who established such a policy, official or otherwise, that lead to this abuse and the multitudes of other similar abuses.
And what would he say when he read an article such as THIS ONE. Though granting, at least, that these egregious activities were serious mistakes, the authors claim that such events only reflected the unintentional consequences of an over-worked, over-loaded, terribly under-staffed, dispirited group of employees in the Cleveland office of the "Revenooer" organization. Seriously... they make it sound like these poor folks felt so isolated and alone... that they were considered second-class citizens within the "revenooer" population, and, horror of horrors, they were stuck in Cleveland... oh, the shame of it all.
By the time one gets through the article, one is expected to feel a degree of sympathy for those poor guys... perhaps more for them than the woman who endured the abuse... or the others like her. Further, somehow, the idea of an over-worked staff who is sincerely trying to handle their case-work with the utmost efficiency because they have so much of it to do, doesn't square very well with the practice of demanding more and more and more and more detail from the applicants, with an ever expanding list of categories. Why, for example, must a list of donors be provided? Why, for another example, must all e-mail correspondence between the organizers and those they were seeking to enlist in the cause, be presented? Especially in light of the recent example of stone-walling by the Administration in furnishing email correspondence to Congress regarding this and other issues.
I think old Patrick Henry would just shake his head at this situation. He might just walk away saying "it's too late. They're too far gone. Something should have been done much sooner before it ever came to this." I think he might be right in that... but morally, that's no excuse.
It is time, in line with the words of Isaiah above, for us to remember that we have a command from our Lord and God to "do something" about injustice. It is not to be silently tolerated. The "oppressor" is to be "rebuked." Plain speaking and simple expectations are needed.
"There is no excuse for this" should be the first line of argument. "Those responsible must be specifically identified and subjected to legal action, no matter who they are or what office they hold" should be the second. And lastly, who ever they are, they are to be "rebuked", by the united voices of the entire community. Solitary and fragmented voices will be ignored.
We must all stand together or we shall surely die separately. Stand up and take a bow, Patrick... for all your faults at least you spoke up when you were needed.
Posted by Gadfly on May 20, 2013 at 09:10 AM in Commentary, Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | | |
|
| Save to del.icio.us