Meditation:
I just returned from conducting a funeral. These things are always solemn occasions and this one was no exception. As always the emotional and spiritual character of those who assemble at such occasions determines the overall impact, but such is not to say that the experience is completely subjective to the specific group. There is a constancy in grief. Perhaps in grief, especially in the face of death, is the essential unity of man most clearly manifest.
Such is not the case with birth, interestingly enough. The modern warm, emotional, "awwww" evoking sentimentality over infants has not always been the case. There were long periods in human history when infants were often viewed with an almost clinical detachment in many cultures. The whole idea of a "milk-nurse" was not just because the birth mother was unable to function in this regard, but because it was a job for a servant. The death rate for infants was so high that quite often a culture would tend toward reserving affection for children to later in their childhood. But the bewailing of death, primarily for adults or near adults, seems universal though not consistently as emotional in some cultures as others
Here are a few questions that were asked regarding my posts on Dawkins The God Delusion. I will respond here rather than in the chain so as to have more room. The italicized words are from him (?), his lines beginning "RE" reflect a quote I had made in the exchange.
RE: "Christianity explains the facts of life and demonstrates the nature of those facts. "
What facts of life does christianity explain? And what facts can human beings NOT explain without recourse to christianity?