The cost of a thing is the amount of what I will call life
which is required to be exchanged for it, immediately or in the long run.
If asked for my preferences among the great and near great philosophers who have walked this planet, Thoreau would not rank all that high on my list. But he does say some stimulating things. This quote is one of them. What is the "life cost" that we are exchanging daily for things which we don't give so much as a second-thought about?
What is the "life cost" of: cell phones, personal internet access, instant global news, air conditioning, supermarkets, automobiles, airline transportation, video games, etc. etc. etc.
Please note that I am not, under any circumstances saying that this things should be abandoned. There is not a Luddite gene in my entire chromosomal make up. I am posting stuff on the internet even as I am munching on the "life cost" of that very activity. Yet our Lord said that in man's endeavors he should "count the cost" (Luke 14:28) and what is so true of our choices for eternity also bids well for consideration as we tread this pesky soil.
I wonder how much it would change our daily life if we undertook to be frugal and efficient, in terms of "life cost", with the various choices we make daily. If we really did a "cost-benefit" analysis of just those things like I am doing now, to see what returns we are reaping contrasted with the investment we make.
Mike Metzger has a post on his site (named in the typically post-modern fashion "Doggie Head Tilt") titled "Loving Your First Enemy". He quotes Thoreau also and is the one who got me thinking about this. He meditates on the way we have conquered our "first enemy" distance, how the effective shortening of space between people has elevated immediacy in all our spheres of interaction and thereby removed the opportunity for reflection before action or speech. The old word "consideration" as in "time to consider", is not available to us in our daily activity. The effect, in a somewhat Darwinian way, is that the survival of the fittest is the survival of the "shallow but quick." Certainly in our national discourse we see this in spades as sentences fly about cyberspace with little regard to substance or even accuracy. We elect our politicians based on impressions. I cannot help but wonder how this affects our view of God and everything else.
Where Metzger singles out "distance" as the culprit, I think it just one "life cost" circumstance among many. The whole range of human endeavor is on a crazy roller-coaster ride. Life is compressed and heated and we see the social effects at every turn. People "hang out" rather than converse. We are bored apart from constant external stimulation. Kids "study" with a CD blaring. If it requires more than a moment's thought or attention, we are distracted. All of these things are the fruit of shaping influences that arise from acquiescence to artificially imposed value promises. Yet the actual return on investment doesn't seem very high and is running negative in my estimation. Perhaps the real "change" we should be promoting this social season is a return to civilization.
Recommended auxiliary reading - Jacques Ellul, The Subversion of Christianity
Recent Comments