Image: "Patiently Waiting", 2020, Severna Park, Md
Job 1:8 Then the LORD said to Satan, “Have you considered My servant Job, that there is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man, one who fears God and shuns evil?”
Job 1:21–22 And he said: “Naked I came from my mother’s womb, And naked shall I return there. The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away; Blessed be the name of the LORD.” 22 In all this Job did not sin nor charge God with wrong.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Sometimes the "critters" get downright pushy. They will perch near a window and chatter or chirp away as if to ask "What's the hold-up"? Where are the goodies?" The cats, ungrateful wretches as they are, will sit at the glass door and scowl at you as you pass by. It is the same with the squirrels shaking their tails and clucking at us.
Not so the beautiful doves. They know the cracked corn is coming... the usual spots on the ground are discolored from past feasts... so they perch nearby and just watch. They are alert to every movement of the door but are mostly unafraid. They trust in the goodness of their provider.
The book of Job is about patience and faith, or "faithful patience." In it we see Job showing marked signs of petulance and complaint, like the more pushy "critters" in our yard, but like the dove, he never gives up trusting in his Provider either. As we read Job it is best to keep in mind that the true "Hero" of Job is another Sufferer who came a thousand or so years later. This "Job" did not grumble or complain though He was afflicted far more than was this Job. We can learn much from Job, but it is the One who was and is greater than Job, Who must be our focus. Job stumbles in his testing, though not as to fall. Our Lord Jesus never stumbled and His end and reward makes Job's restoration and glorification appear puny indeed.
A couple of words about this book. It is ancient... perhaps the oldest in origin of all the canon. It tells of a man in a place called Uz which we cannot fix with any certainty. There are no historical markers in the book so we cannot fix exactly when he lived in relation to other Biblical characters. I tend to think that he lived around the time of Melchizedek and was heir to the same religious tradition as he. We know he worshiped God.
The story line has many points of contact with other ancient literature. Other civilizations had their "Job story" but it is unique in the "faithfulness" that Job displays and the startling confrontation with God that ends the story. Since Job cannot, with certainty, be counted in the Israelite race and the name Job shows up in other cultures, we should take verse 3 at face value: "... this man was the greatest of all the people of the East." That means that God still had faithful followers, like Melchizedek, among the other tribes descended from Noah and Job's story took on legend form among those tribes. Our blessing is that we have the Spirit inspired version and it is His preservation of it which evokes our confidence.
The message of Job is laid out before us in chapter 1. Job is a "righteous man", one whom God Himself considers "blameless and upright." This is not to say he was sinless... far from it. Job is characterized by worship, offering sacrifices for himself and his family. Job was conscious of his fallen sinfulness as was God. But God says that Job's character was that of one who "fears God and shuns evil." Here is the essential character of "faith." Faith is that quality in us that causes us to respect ("fear") God for Who He is and which moves us to hate evil. It is grounded in trust because the God Whom we respect / fear has made a way for us to be "blameless and upright" before Him. Job knew that his sacrifices did not, of themselves, pay for his sins... but he trusted that God had made a way for him to be treated as just. This was the ancient gospel and we are so blessed to know now, through Christ, just how that worked out.
But the story line continues. We are given a glimpse of a heavenly throne room (cf. Rev. 4 & 5) where Satan, the enemy of God and righteous man, challenges God to test Job's righteousness. Satan has already had long experience with turning men's hearts away from their Creator and he is confident that if Job is stripped of all his wealth and prosperity, then Job will prove just as quick to condemn God as he was to praise Him previously. Satan is granted the authority to start persecuting Job.
In verses 13-18 we should note the range of disasters that fall on Job. They are "natural" and "evil inspired" calamities. Thus we see that there are dark powers in the world that can bring about sudden changes in our fortunes. Something we should take to heart.
The closing verses though (20-22) can be taken as the message of the entire book. Job understands that the ultimate cause of his "misfortunes" is that they reflect the will of God. It is God's to give... it is God's to take away. It is man's duty, like Job, to worship and "bless the name of the LORD" in whatever circumstances he faces. "In all this Job did not sin nor charge God with wrong." What better epitaph could be written on our tombstone than this?
Job's story is the story of "everyman" as far as the ubiquity of suffering goes. Job's story is beautiful call to God's people to remember that their God can be trusted to provide, in due time, that for which they patiently wait.
Esther 8-10: It is a Riddle, Wrapped in a Mystery, Inside an Enigma;
Image: Conundrum, 2019, Severna Park, Md
Esther 9:1 Now in the twelfth month, that is, the month of Adar, on the thirteenth day, the time came for the king’s command and his decree to be executed. On the day that the enemies of the Jews had hoped to overpower them, the opposite occurred, in that the Jews themselves overpowered those who hated them.
___________________________________________________________________________________
The title of this post is taken from Winston Churchill's 1939 speech about Russia. Churchill's phrases often passed into general use. This one certainly has, being quoted even in a Seinfeld episode. It brilliantly describes a "conundrum", a difficult thing composed of many layers or components which, taken individually, don't seem to make sense or "fit" together... yet they do.
The book of Esther might very well fall into this category... especially the closing chapters 8-10. Several perplexing aspects of this book confront us right away.
Firstly, strangely, it never explicitly mentions God at all. The closest we come to a God reference is in 4:14 which I considered in the meditation on that chapter. Mordecai apparently alludes to the OT history of God's judgment on people and their houses if they fail to do what they should. That's about it.
Secondly is the story's literary style. Some scholars have classified it as "comedy" with no disparagement intended. The characterization of Haman as an arch-villain and his humiliation when he has to parade Mordecai around at the king's command are the kind of things that some see to support this. This idea is part of the larger question about the content. The detailed descriptions of settings and events, like the following story of Job and also the Song of Solomon, seem highly stylized and may have been used as pious literature (which does not mean they are not true)... it just classifies them as something like Proverbs.
Third is the strange action of the king. What kind of king would sanction a civil war within his domain? The king first authorizes the extermination and pillage of the Jews under Haman's influence and then, since he couldn't revoke an edict he had already distributed, allows Mordecai to issue another edict which says the Jews can not only defend themselves but pillage their oppressors (8:11). In the narrative the king appears unfazed when he is told that 75,000 of his subjects died.
Lastly, of course, is the national feast instituted by Mordecai with the king's obvious blessing. We read the familiar words about the Jews having rest from their enemies (9:22) which usually was applied to the people in the promised land. It is strange that this implies that the Jews were to feel "at home" in Persia and the national holiday (Purim) would celebrate their protected status in the king's dominions.
In the face of all these strange aspects, chapter 10 closes with a clear, Joseph-like, affirmation of historical reality. The king's acts are said to be recorded in the "chronicles of the kings of Media and Persia." Mordecai is said to be mentioned in them also as the "second" to the king and is strongly hinted as being the real author of his greatness. The clear comparison with Joseph under Pharaoh reminds us of a major biblical theme, that what men mean for evil God uses for good. That "good" in this book is clearly stated: Mordecai was elevated by God to his high position in order to seek the good of his people and speak peace to all his countrymen. No one can argue that this is not the main point of the book and thus, however mysterious its form and content may appear, its truth is undeniable.
So the story of Esther closes. We might wish that there was something written in the New Testament to help us understand it better but there are no NT quotes or references to my knowledge. We are left with an unforgettable narrative and that may be its original purpose. Something happened in this phase of Jewish history. There was a time when, during the captivity, the Jews were saved from extermination by the actions of a queen. In this action, the Jews actually came out on top and the season of mourning was turned to joy. This became a feast, instituted not as part of the Mosaic Law but as a national, historical memory. This story brilliantly and memorably provides the narrative for the celebration.
God has placed this narrative within His canon and therefore we are to embrace the truths which it proclaims. At the pinnacle of its proclamation is that this fallen world, with man in it, is indeed a "riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma." With our limited abilities and finite comprehension, we can never really understand how it all fits together. We cannot precisely state, ever, apart from Biblical revelation that "such and such was God's plan in order to accomplish this or that." There are some narrowly defined instance where we might truly say something like this, but even then, we know that there are far more things that went into whatever events we are considering than just the surface events themselves.
What we can rest in is this. This world, with all its complexities and riddles, is the one God has decreed to exist. It was to this world and its continuing history that He sent His Son. It is the culmination of this world, with its complexities, that will usher in His Eternal Kingdom when, at last, we will have a fuller measure of understanding and, I think, hindsight. "We'll know it better bye and bye." Until then, like Mordecai, we have to trust in the unchanging Person of our Triune God. He is the only Answer which ties it all together.
Posted by Gadfly on February 28, 2020 at 10:51 AM in Church, Commentary, Culture, Movies, etc., Devotional Meditation, Discipleship | Permalink | Comments (0)
Reblog (0) | | | |
| Save to del.icio.us